Skip to main content

Author: Editor VCD

Is using beats from other people’s songs a copyright violation?

The trend of covering, remixing or making short videos with “catchy” background music is spreading across social media channels: TikTok, YouTube, Facebook. But among those countless attractive remixes, few people know that just by reusing someone else’s beat without permission, you can violate music copyright. So is using beats from other people’s songs really illegal? Let’s find out with VCD!

What is a beat? Who owns the copyright to the beat?

“Music beat” is understood as the background music or arrangement without lyrics, which acts as a framework, creating emotions and rhythm for the entire song. In the process of music production, beats are often created by arrangers, music producers (producers) or record labels, to serve as a background for singers, rappers or content creators to use to sing, rap, remix or make videos. It can be said that, although it does not contain lyrics, the beat is the “soul” that contributes to shaping the style, color and appeal of a musical work.

Not only does it have artistic value, the beat is also an intellectual property with economic value. In many cases, a beat can be sold, licensed or transferred at a very high price, especially when it is created by famous music producers. Therefore, the beat is not simply “background music for singing” but also an independent creative product, protected by law similar to the lyrics or melody of a song.

According to Article 14 of the Intellectual Property Law 2022, protected musical works include harmony, arrangement, accompaniment, beat and melody. This provision affirms that each element in a song, whether lyrics, melody or beat, is considered part of the original musical work and can be protected independently if it meets the conditions of creativity.

That also means that the creator of the beat is the copyright owner of that music, unless they have transferred or signed a contract to transfer ownership to another party such as a record company, singer or production unit. In that case, the right to use, exploit and allow others to use the beat will be decided by the recipient.

In short, a beat is not only a part of music but also a fully copyrighted work with legal, artistic and commercial value. Understanding this nature helps content creators, artists or businesses using music know how to respect intellectual property rights and avoid copyright infringement risks during the exploitation process.

Is using a beat from someone else’s song a copyright infringement?

Even if it is just a few dozen seconds of background music, that beat is still considered an independent musical work protected by law. Therefore, reusing a beat without the owner’s permission is an infringement of copyright, an act that can be handled according to the provisions of the Intellectual Property Law.

According to Article 20 of the Intellectual Property Law 2022, the owner of a musical work has the full right to perform or allow others to perform the following acts:

  • Copy, distribute, or communicate the work to the public (for example, publish, post on social networks, YouTube, etc.);
  • Create derivative works (such as remixing, remixing, adding new lyrics, or using the original beat for a cover).

Thus, if you take a beat from someone else’s song to record, remix, sing a cover, or use it in a promotional video without permission, you have infringed on the property rights of the author or beat owner. Even if you clearly state the source or “just for fun”, that action can still be considered an infringement, because copyright does not depend on commercial or non-commercial purposes, just using it without permission is an infringement.

If you violate copyright by using beats from other people’s songs, you may face the following forms of handling:

  • Administrative sanctions: According to Decree 17/2023/ND-CP, copyright infringement can be fined from 10 to 30 million VND; forced to remove videos, posts containing infringing beats; forced to destroy infringing evidence (discs, music files, etc.).
  • Video removed, blocked from monetization or account locked: Platforms such as YouTube, Facebook, TikTok all have Content ID systems that automatically detect copyrighted beats. When detected, the video can be removed or monetized; receive copyright warnings; the account can be deleted if it violates repeatedly.
  • Civil and criminal liability: In serious cases, the beat owner has the right to sue for compensation for damages (licensing costs, reputational damage, etc.). If the act has a commercial element or causes great damage, you may be prosecuted under Article 225 of the 2015 Penal Code, with a fine of up to 1 billion VND or imprisonment of up to 3 years.
Is using beats from other people's songs a copyright violation?

Cases of using beats that are not considered copyright infringement

In some cases, using beats from other people’s songs is not considered copyright infringement, as long as the user complies with the provisions of copyright law. Here are some legal exceptions allowed by law:

  • With the owner’s permission: You can buy the copyright of the beat or ask for permission to use it from the owner. Sign a contract to use the beat within the permitted scope (Example: Only use for livestream, not for performing).
  • Using free beats: Some beats can be shared as “free beats” or in the public domain, meaning anyone can use them without permission. However, you need to check the terms of use carefully: Many producers allow free use but not commercialization (Example: Do not post YouTube with monetization enabled).
  • Using beats for research, teaching, or commentary purposes: According to Article 25 of the Intellectual Property Law 2022, reasonable citation of published works for non-commercial purposes (teaching, commenting, research, etc.) is not considered copyright infringement. However, you still need to clearly state the source and not affect the owner’s exploitation rights.

Above is the article on “Is using beats from other people’s songs a copyright infringement?” that VCD shares with you. Hopefully, respecting copyright not only helps you protect your personal reputation and brand, but also contributes to building a healthy, professional and fair music creation environment for everyone.

Sincerely,

1. If you only use a short beat of a few seconds, is it considered an infringement?

Yes. The law does not specify a “minimum length” for a protected piece of music, so using just a part of a beat without permission is an act of copyright infringement. Platforms like YouTube or TikTok have automatic audio recognition systems (Content ID) that can detect duplicate beats, leading to videos being removed, blocked from monetization or copyright claims.

2. How to use beats legally without worrying about copyright infringement?

You can use beats legally by:
Buying or licensing the beat from the author or record label;
Using free beats with a clear license (royalty-free, creative commons, etc.);
Producing or hiring a producer to compose new beats;
Avoiding using beats extracted from commercial songs without permission.
Complying with copyright not only helps you avoid legal risks but also shows respect for the artist’s creative efforts.

Is it a copyright violation to post a football highlight video cut from a TV channel?

What is a football highlight video cut from a TV channel?

Football highlight videos are short videos that summarize outstanding, notable situations in a match, usually goals, saves, dangerous shots, or controversial situations. The purpose of highlights is to help viewers quickly grasp the main developments of the match without having to watch the entire 90 minutes.

Currently, highlight videos are widely released on many platforms such as YouTube, Facebook, TikTok or official sports sites. However, not everyone can produce and publish football highlights. Usually, the copyright to broadcast and edit highlights belongs to the unit that holds the copyright of the match, such as VTV, K+ or FPT Play in Vietnam.

That means, if you do not own or have not been licensed to use the image content from this source, cutting and re-posting the highlight video may violate the copyright and related rights of the copyright holder.

Is posting a football highlight video cut from a TV channel a copyright violation?

According to the 2022 Vietnamese Intellectual Property Law, copyright includes personal rights and property rights to the work, including broadcasting rights, copying rights, distribution rights and communication rights to the public.

For football matches, all images, sounds, commentary, graphics, logos, sound effects… recorded, edited and broadcast by the TV channel are considered copyrighted works or subjects related to copyright.

When you download videos from copyrighted TV channels such as VTV, K+, FPT Play, VTC, ON Sports…, then cut, edit and re-post them on platforms such as YouTube, TikTok, Facebook or personal websites without an agreement or license to use, that action is considered an infringement of copyright and related rights. The reason is because you are using part or all of the content that others have invested in producing, including the rights to record, broadcast, comment, editing techniques and even the creative elements of the production team. Even if you cite the source, attach a logo or declare it “non-profit”, that action is still a violation of the law if not permitted by the copyright owner.

Forms of handling according to legal regulations:

  • Administrative sanctions: According to Decree 17/2023/ND-CP, acts of copyright infringement can be fined from 10 to 30 million VND, along with measures to force the removal or destruction of the infringing video.
  • Risk of channel lockout, loss of revenue: Platforms like YouTube or TikTok have an automatic copyright scanning system (Content ID). If duplicate content is detected, your video may be deleted, monetized, or your account may be locked.
Is it a copyright violation to post a football highlight video cut from a TV channel?

How to create legal football content, avoid copyright infringement

In the era of strong social media development, football highlight videos are always a “gold mine” attracting views and interactions. However, many content creators, due to lack of legal knowledge, accidentally violate copyright, leading to loss of channel, loss of revenue, and even being fined.

To share your passion for football while complying with the law, you can refer to some of the following legal, creative and sustainable ways to create content:

  • Make your own videos commenting, analyzing, predicting or evaluating tactics, using legal illustrations (For example: Predicting results or comparing squads – “The strongest squad of Euro 2025 if not injured”.). This is the safest and most encouraged form. You can completely create unique videos with your own perspective and football knowledge.
  • Link or embed official highlight videos from copyrighted channels (for example, YouTube pages of K+, VTV, FPT Play …). This method not only helps viewers access legitimate sources, but also helps you build clean, trustworthy content, without worrying about having your videos deleted or your channel locked.
  • Make reaction videos, analyze situations but do not directly insert footage from copyrighted videos, instead only use photos or simulated graphics. This form is used by many professional football YouTube and TikTok channels, helping them to both ensure copyright protection and maintain attractive and unique content.
  • Cooperate or ask for copyright permission from broadcasting rights holders if you want to exploit official content for commercial purposes (For example: match review, re-report, post highlights to make money). Units such as K+, FPT Play, VTVcab, Next Media… often have policies on content cooperation or licensing for qualified media channels, partners or creators. When there is a cooperation agreement, you will be allowed to use highlight videos, interview clips or official graphics, and at the same time receive legal protection and the opportunity to legally earn money from football content. This is a professional and long-term direction if you really want to develop in the sports media sector.

Above is the article “Is posting football highlight videos cut from TV channels a copyright violation?” that VCD wants to share with you. Respecting copyright not only helps you avoid breaking the law but also builds a professional and trustworthy image in the sports content creation community.

Sincerely,

1. If I record my screen while watching football and post it online, is it a copyright violation?

Yes. Even if you record it yourself with your personal device, the content inside is still an image signal produced and broadcast by the TV station. Therefore, posting this video online without the consent of the copyright holder is still considered an infringement of broadcasting rights according to Article 44 of the Intellectual Property Law.

2. If I only post a short part of the match, is it considered a copyright violation?

According to Article 28 of the Intellectual Property Law, even if only a part of the content of a TV program is used without the consent of the owner, that act is still considered illegal copying and editing. Only in the case of reasonable quotation for commentary, illustration and clearly stating the source is considered a legal exception according to Article 25 of the Intellectual Property Law.

Is sharing free ebooks online a violation of copyright?

The habit of downloading and sharing free ebooks on social networks, forums, or Google Drive has become too familiar to many book lovers. However, this seemingly harmless action has the potential to seriously violate copyright. So, is sharing free ebooks a violation of copyright? Let’s find out with VCD in the article below!

What is an ebook?

An ebook (short for electronic book) is a form of book published in digital form and exists as an electronic file (digital file). Readers can use ebooks through personal devices such as computers, smartphones, tablets or specialized e-readers.

Unlike traditional printed books, ebooks are published and distributed on the Internet, allowing users to buy, download and read right on their devices whether connected or not. Popular ebook formats include EPUB, PDF, MOBI, AZW, TXT…, which are designed to prevent content editing but still allow readers to customize the display interface such as font size, font style, landscape – portrait, compatible with many different screen sizes.

Thanks to their convenience, ebooks are increasingly popular because they can save storage space, cost less than paper books, are easy to shop online and are convenient to carry when traveling.

According to the 2022 Intellectual Property Law, ebooks are still considered a literary work in electronic form, so they are protected by copyright law similar to traditional printed books. This means that ebooks are protected like traditional printed books, including personal rights (naming, title, protecting the integrity of the work) and property rights (copying, distributing, communicating, publishing the work…).

Does sharing free ebooks online violate copyright?

Every work, whether ebook, movie, music or image, is the result of the author’s creative and intellectual labor. Therefore, copying, posting or distributing without permission is a violation.

According to Article 20 of the Intellectual Property Law 2022, the copyright owner has the exclusive right to allow others to perform acts such as copying, distributing, and communicating the work to the public. Therefore, the act of sharing free ebooks online is considered a copyright violation if:

  • The ebook is still under copyright protection, that is, during the author’s lifetime and 50 years after the author’s death (as prescribed in Article 27 of the Intellectual Property Law 2022);
  • The sharer does not have permission from the author or publisher;
  • The ebook is copied, uploaded to social networks, websites, forums or publicly stored (such as Google Drive, Zalo, Telegram…).

For example: Downloading a paid ebook from Tiki or Waka and then reposting it publicly for everyone to download. This behavior is considered an infringement of the right to copy and distribute the work, even if you do not charge money.

On the contrary, cases of sharing ebooks that are considered legal include:

  • The ebook is published for free by the author with a clear notice of the sharing rights (For example, released under an open license such as Creative Commons).
  • The ebook has expired copyright protection, meaning the work belongs to the public domain.
  • You only share the link to a legal publishing site (such as Tiki, Waka, Google Books, or the author’s website), but do not post a copy of the ebook.
Is sharing free ebooks online a violation of copyright?

Legal consequences of sharing copyrighted ebooks

Sharing copyrighted ebooks is not just an act of “sharing for fun” as many people think, but is actually an infringement of copyright. Depending on the nature and severity of the violation, the perpetrator may be subject to different levels of sanctions.

According to Decree 17/2023/ND-CP, the administrative penalties for copyright infringement are as follows:

  • Acts of infringement of the right to distribute works: Fine from 10 – 30 million VND, forced removal of infringing copies of ebooks or destruction of infringing exhibits.
  • Acts of infringement of the right to communicate works to the public (posting, sharing ebooks online): Fine from 15 – 30 million VND, forced removal of infringing copies of works.
  • Acts of illegal copying of works: Fine from 15 – 35 million VND, and forced removal or destruction of illegal copies.

In addition to fines, violators may also be forced to remove infringing content, publicly apologize, and compensate for civil damages… if they affect the rights and interests of the author or publisher.

Thus, whether for the purpose of sharing, learning or entertainment, posting or spreading copyrighted ebooks without permission carries significant legal risks. The best way to avoid violations is to only read and share ebooks from legal sources, respect the author’s creative efforts, and contribute to building a transparent and copyright-respecting intellectual environment.

Above is the article “Does sharing free ebooks online violate copyright?” shared by VCD to help you better understand the legal consequences and how to use ebooks legally.

Sincerely,

1. Can I share ebooks if I only use them for personal study and research?

According to Article 25 of the Intellectual Property Law, users can copy a reasonable part of a work for personal study and research purposes without asking for permission and without paying royalties. However, posting an entire ebook online, even for study purposes, is still an act of unauthorized publication, because the content has been communicated to the public. Therefore, you should only quote or use it for personal use, not share it publicly.

2. Is it okay if I share a free ebook but clearly state the author’s name and source?

Statement of the author’s name and source only shows respect for personal rights, but does not replace asking for permission to use the work. According to Article 20 and Article 28 of the Intellectual Property Law, authors and owners still have the exclusive right to distribute, copy and communicate the work. Therefore, even if you clearly state the source but arbitrarily post the entire ebook online without permission, it is still considered copyright infringement and may be subject to administrative penalties.

Is rebroadcasting someone else’s livestream video a copyright infringement?

With the explosion of social networks, livestreaming has become a popular form of helping individuals and businesses quickly interact with audiences. However, a problem that makes many people wonder if rebroadcasting someone else’s livestream video is considered a copyright infringement? To understand clearly, let’s find out more details with VCD in the article below.

What is livestream and who owns the copyright?

Livestream is a form of live video broadcasting on social networking platforms or websites such as Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, Shopee Live… During the broadcast, all images, sounds, words or content displayed are owned by the creator of the livestream, which can be the cameraman, speaker, organizer, content production business or the technical team behind it.

According to the Vietnamese Intellectual Property Law, livestreaming is considered an audiovisual work, which is a type of creative work with independent value, protected similarly to videos, films or television programs. This includes recording rights, broadcasting rights, copying rights, distribution rights and re-display rights.

The livestreamer is the copyright owner (or the organization authorized to hold the broadcasting rights) and any act of reusing, downloading, rebroadcasting or editing livestream content requires legal written permission from the owner. Unauthorized use not only infringes copyright but can also affect the reputation, image and economic interests of the original content creator.

Is rebroadcasting someone else’s livestream video a copyright infringement?

According to Article 28 of the Intellectual Property Law, the act of using, copying, broadcasting, distributing, or re-posting a work without the owner’s consent is considered copyright infringement.

Specifically, downloading someone else’s livestream video and rebroadcasting it on social media platforms can be considered copyright infringement, especially when:

  • You do not have the consent of the original content creator.
  • The replayed video does not clearly state the source or does not cite the exact source.
  • You cut, edit to advertise, attract views or profit.
  • You use the video for commercial purposes such as selling, running ads, or making money from views.

Depending on the level of violation, the person rebroadcasting someone else’s livestream video can be subject to:

  • Administrative fines of 15 – 35 million VND according to Decree 17/2023/ND-CP.
  • Forced to remove the infringing video or compensate the copyright owner for damages.
  • Channel locked, video deleted or civil lawsuit if the act causes serious damage.

Thus, even if it is just “re-sharing” or “re-broadcasting for fun”, using someone else’s livestream video without permission still poses a great legal risk.

Is rebroadcasting someone else's livestream video a copyright infringement?

When is it allowed to re-broadcast someone else’s livestream?

Not all cases of re-broadcasting a livestream are violations. There are some legal exceptions that you can apply, as long as you comply with copyright regulations.

  • With explicit permission from the owner: If you have permission from the author, streamer or organizer (in writing or via a confirmation message), you can absolutely re-broadcast the video without breaking the law. This is the safest and most transparent way.
  • Livestreams in the public domain: Some content voluntarily placed in the public domain by government agencies, public organizations, or authors can be reused without permission. However, you should check the source carefully to avoid confusion.
  • Use within scope: In some cases, you can quote a part of the livestream content for illustration, commentary, or reporting as long as it does not affect the rights of the original author. For example: Reporters use a short livestream in a news report, lecturers replay a part for teaching purposes, commentators take a small excerpt to criticize or analyze the content. However, this does not allow replaying the entire livestream, especially if you repost it on your personal channel or use it for commercial purposes.

How to legally use other people’s livestream videos

To avoid copyright infringement when using or replaying other people’s livestream videos, you should follow some important principles below. These tips will not only help you protect yourself from legal risks, but also show respect for the creative rights of others in the online environment:

  • Always ask for permission before using videos, especially with streamers, brands, or channels with a large number of viewers.
  • Clearly state the source, author’s name or original link when sharing.
  • Do not edit, cut, or attach your own logo to other people’s videos.
  • Avoid rebroadcasting the original on your channel, unless you have permission to rebroadcast.
  • If you want to use the video as illustrative material, keep it short, clearly annotated, and do not commercialize the content.

Above is the article “Is rebroadcasting someone else’s livestream video a copyright infringement?” compiled and shared by VCD. Hopefully this information will help you better understand digital content copyright regulations and know how to use livestream videos legally and safely.

Sincerely,

If I just re-share the livestream on Facebook or YouTube using the “Share” button, is it a copyright violation?

No. When you properly use the sharing feature (Share) provided by the platform, you do not copy or replay the content, so you do not infringe copyright. However, if you download the video, replay it on your own account, or insert your logo or advertisement, it is considered copying and unauthorized use of the work, violating Article 28 of the Intellectual Property Law 2022.

Can I re-use part of someone else’s livestream video to illustrate in my video?

According to Article 25 of the Intellectual Property Law 2022, you are only allowed to reasonably quote someone else’s work on the condition that you clearly state the author’s name, source, and do not distort the content. Cutting, editing or using livestream excerpts for commercial purposes without permission from the owner is still considered copyright infringement and may be subject to penalties.

If someone hires someone to design a jewelry model, who owns the copyright?

Jewelry design is not only an art but also a valuable intellectual property. Many businesses, brands or individuals choose to hire a designer or a jewelry design unit instead of creating their own. However, when hiring a designer, who owns the copyright of the jewelry design, the hirer or the designer? Let’s find out more in the article below with VCD to avoid unnecessary legal risks.

  1. Are jewelry designs protected by copyright?

According to the Vietnamese Intellectual Property Law, works of applied art – including jewelry designs, accessories, and handicraft products – are all subject to copyright protection if they meet two conditions:

  • Have creativity and a unique mark, not copied from other works.
  • Expressed in a specific material form, such as a drawing, 3D model, CAD design or finished product sample.

Thus, each sketch, design drawing or jewelry sample is considered a creative work, and the creator will be recognized as the author by default by law, unless there is another agreement on ownership.

2. If someone hires someone to design a jewelry model, who owns the copyright?

This is a point that often causes confusion between “copyright” and “ownership of the work”. When you hire someone else to design jewelry, it is important to understand that: The person who directly creates the design (the designer) is still recognized by law as the author of the work. However, the copyright ownership, that is, the right to use, exploit, distribute or transfer the design, will belong to the lessee, if there is a contract between the two parties for hiring the creation of the work and it clearly stipulates the transfer of ownership.

This is specifically stipulated in Article 41 of the 2022 Intellectual Property Law: “The organization or individual to whom one, some or all of the rights are transferred as agreed in the contract is the copyright owner.”

If you hire a designer to create a jewelry design, you (the hirer) will be the copyright owner of that design if there is a written contract stating that all ownership of the work (including the right to copy, produce, and distribute) is transferred to you upon completion.

On the contrary, if there is no clear contract, the designer will still retain the copyright and ownership, while you only have the right to use the design within the scope of the verbal agreement or payment of the fee, which can easily lead to disputes later.

3. Risks of not clearly stating ownership in the design contract

In reality, many small businesses, workshops or individuals starting a business in the jewelry industry ignore this legal factor. The possible consequences of not clearly defining ownership in the design contract are:

  • The designer retains the right to publish or resell the design to others, because you do not have a document proving ownership.
  • The jewelry design is copied or copyrighted first, causing you to lose the right to exploit the product you ordered to design.
  • Difficulty in registering copyright or industrial design protection, because you cannot prove that you are the legal owner.
  • Commercial disputes occur when the design is used for mass production without a clear agreement on rights and profits.

Therefore, signing a detailed and legal design contract is mandatory if you want to protect your rights in the long term.

4. How to ensure copyright ownership when hiring a designer?

To avoid the above risks, businesses or individuals hiring designers should note the following important things:

  • Sign a clear contract with a clause on ownership transfer. The contract must clearly state that the designer creates the model according to the request of the lessee. After handover, all ownership and exploitation rights of the design belong to the lessee. The designer is not allowed to use, edit, resell or share the model with a third party.
  • Keep payment records and documents: Receipts, invoices, email exchanges, original sketches, etc. are evidence of the creative rental relationship, helping to protect your rights if a dispute arises.
  • Register copyright or industrial design early: After receiving the design, you should register for protection at the Copyright Office or the Intellectual Property Office. This helps confirm that you are the legal owner and have a clear legal basis when there is an act of copying or infringement.
  • Reuse or credit agreement: If you want to maintain a good working relationship, you can allow the designer to retain the right to credit the author, or display the design in a personal portfolio, as long as it is not used for commercial purposes.

Above is the article “If someone hires someone to design a jewelry model who owns the copyright?” compiled and shared by VCD. To avoid disputes and protect creative value, always sign a written contract, clearly stating rights and obligations, and register for protection for your designs early.

Sincerely,

What should a business do to ensure that it owns the copyright of a jewelry design after hiring a designer?

To ensure legal ownership, a business needs to:
*Sign a written design contract, which clearly stipulates:
– The designer transfers all property rights (copyrights, distribution, production, trade, etc.) to the business.
– The business has the exclusive right to use, register copyright, and commercially exploit that design.
– The remuneration, payment method, and time of transfer of ownership.
*Register copyright/design rights at the Copyright Office (Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism) as a legal basis in case of dispute.
*Keep design documents, contracts, and original products to prove ownership.

If a designer arbitrarily uses or resells a jewelry design designed for a business, is it considered a copyright infringement?

Yes. If the business has been transferred property rights under the contract, any act of using, copying, transferring, or reselling that design by the designer is considered an infringement of copyright under Article 28 of the Intellectual Property Law 2022.
Depending on the level of violation, the designer may be subject to administrative sanctions, civil compensation, or criminal prosecution if causing serious damage to the business.

Can an author authorize another person to register a copyright?

In reality, the author cannot always directly submit a copyright registration application for his work. For reasons of time, geography or to ensure the accuracy of the application, many people choose to authorize another organization or individual to carry out the procedure on their behalf. However, many people still wonder whether authorizing copyright registration is permitted by law or not? The following article from VCD will help you.

1.      What is authorization? How long is the authorization period?

Authorization is an agreement between the parties according to which the authorized party will be obliged to perform the work on behalf of the authorizing party.

Authorization is one of two forms of representation as prescribed by law, recognized in Article 135 of the 2015 Civil Code. Accordingly, the right of representation is established by authorization between the represented person and the representative (called authorized representation) or by decision of a competent state agency, according to the charter of the legal entity or according to the provisions of law (generally called legal representation).

Regarding the term, currently, the 2015 Civil Code does not specifically regulate the power of attorney, but regulates authorization through a contract.

According to Article 563 of the 2015 Civil Code, the term of authorization is agreed upon by the parties or prescribed by law; if there is no agreement and no provision of law, the authorization contract is valid for 01 year from the date of establishment of authorization.

Therefore, according to the above provisions, the term of the authorization contract is determined in three cases:

  • The authorization term is agreed upon by the parties;
  • The authorization term is prescribed by law;
  • If there is no agreement and no provision of law, the authorization contract is valid for 01 year from the date of establishment of the authorization.
Can an author authorize another person to register a copyright?

2.      Can the author authorize another person to register copyright?

According to the provisions of Clause 1, Article 50 of the 2005 Law on Intellectual Property (amended and supplemented in 2022), the author or copyright owner can directly submit the application for copyright registration or authorize another organization or individual to submit the application on their behalf. This authorization is permitted by law to facilitate the applicant, especially in cases where they cannot directly carry out the procedure at the competent authority.

Pursuant to Clause 6, Article 38 of Decree 17/2023/ND-CP, the authorization document must be made in writing and include the following basic contents:

  • Information of the authorizing party and the authorized person (full name, address, contact);
  • Specific name of the work authorized for registration (for example: musical, literary, fine art, photographic work, etc.);
  • Scope of authorization, clearly stating the authorized person is allowed to perform tasks such as submitting documents, signing, monitoring documents, receiving the Certificate of Copyright Registration;
  • Duration of authorization;
  • In case the authorizing party is an individual, the authorization document must have a notarized signature to ensure legality.

According to the provisions of Article 39 of Decree 17/2023/ND-CP, in addition to the registration form and a copy of the work, the copyright registration dossier must also include a power of attorney in case the applicant is not the author or direct owner. The copyright registration dossier includes:

  • Copyright registration form (according to the form issued by the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism);
  • Two copies of the registered work (printed or hard copy; if there is an electronic copy, submit the data file);
  • Power of attorney (if the dossier is submitted through a representative, and the signature must be certified if the authorized party is an individual);
  • Documents proving ownership of the work (such as citizen identification card, business registration certificate, transfer contract, inheritance document, or decision to assign creative tasks, etc.);
  • Written consent of co-authors (in case the work has two or more authors);
  • Written consent of co-owners (if the work has multiple owners);
  • Written consent of the person with the image if the work uses a personal image;
  • Documents in foreign languages ​​(if any) must be translated into Vietnamese and properly certified.

In reality, copyright registration often requires an understanding of legal regulations and experience in handling documents. Many individuals have difficulty determining the type of work, preparing documents proving ownership or explaining to competent authorities. Therefore, authorizing a specialized organization or individual to carry out the registration procedure not only saves time and effort, but also ensures that the documents are prepared in accordance with regulations and limits legal risks.

Above is the article “Can an author authorize another person to register copyright?” that VCD sends to you. We hope this article is useful to you.

Sincerely,

Frequently asked questions

What should an author do if he/she cannot submit the copyright application in person

Answer: In case the author cannot submit the application in person, he/she can authorize an individual or organization to provide consulting or services on copyright and related rights that have been recognized and permitted by the Copyright Office.

Does the authorization document between the author and the individual or organization receiving the authorization have to be notarized?

Answer: According to the provisions of Clause 6, Article 38 of Decree 17/2023, “In case the authorizing party is an individual, the authorization document must be authenticated in accordance with the provisions of law”, therefore, if the author authorizes another individual or organization, that document must be authenticated or notarized by a competent authority.

What do you need to do to register a copyright for a game character?

Game characters are not only the soul of the game but also a valuable intellectual property for the developer. From appearance design, personality to the associated storyline, all reflect the unique creativity of the production team. However, if not legally protected, these characters are very susceptible to being copied or illegally exploited. So, what do you need to do to register a copyright for a game character? Let’s find out more with VCD through the article below.

1. What is registering a copyright for a game character?

According to the provisions of the Intellectual Property Law and Decree 17/2023/ND-CP, any work expressing creativity in a specific material form can be protected by copyright. In particular, game characters are considered works of visual or applied art, including images, personalities, behaviors, dialogue, costumes and related storylines.

In other words, registering a game character copyright is when an author or developer submits an application to the Copyright Office to be granted a Copyright Registration Certificate – a legal document confirming legal ownership of that character.

2. Why is it necessary to register a game character copyright?

Although copyright arises automatically from the moment the character is created and shaped in a certain material form, in reality, copyright registration is still an extremely important and necessary step to ensure the legitimate rights of the creator, especially in today’s competitive and highly globalized gaming environment.

Specifically, registering a game character copyright is necessary because:

  • Proving legal ownership: A copyright registration certificate is the clearest and most valuable legal evidence when a copyright dispute occurs. In case another party copies or uses the character’s image or idea without permission, the owner can easily prove his/her rights and request handling of violations according to the law.
  • Easy commercial exploitation: Once the game character is protected, the owner can transfer, license, or cooperate commercially with third parties in many fields such as movies, advertising, fashion or souvenir production. Having a copyright certificate helps increase reliability and transparency in contracts, while opening up opportunities to generate sustainable revenue from the character.
  • Minimize the risk of infringement and disputes: In the game industry, duplication of ideas or creations is very likely to happen. Once a copyright certificate is available, the developer has a basis to assert creative priority, helping to avoid lengthy and complicated legal disputes.
  • Advantages when expanding to the international market: A copyright registration certificate in Vietnam is an important legal basis when wanting to register or protect in other countries under the Berne Convention. This is especially meaningful for game studios aiming to publish products to the global market, ensuring that the character is still protected in a wider scope.

In short, copyright registration is not only a legal protection measure for creative achievements, but also a long-term strategy to help enhance the brand value of the game developer, creating a solid foundation for product commercialization and expanding operations in the international market.

What do you need to do to register a copyright for a game character?

3. What does a game character copyright registration file include?

To register a game character copyright, the author or business needs to prepare a complete file according to the instructions of the Copyright Office, including:

  • Copyright registration form (according to the prescribed form);
  • A detailed description of the character, stating: Character name, appearance, style, identifying features; story, role in the game, creative ideas;
  • Image or character design (2D, 3D, concept art…);
  • Excerpt or script showing the character in the game (if there are dialogues, actions…);
  • Documents of the owner and author: CCCD or passport, business registration certificate (organization);
  • A guarantee that the work is created by the author himself/herself and not copied;
  • Authorization letter (if submitted through a representative unit).

After completion, the dossier is submitted to the Copyright Office for review. Within 15 – 20 working days, if the dossier is valid, the author or owner will receive a Certificate of Copyright Registration for the character in the game.

4. Some notes when registering copyright for game characters

Here are some important notes when registering copyright for game characters that not everyone knows:

  • If the game has many characters, you can register a common set of characters to save costs.
  • You should register the entire game product (interface, sound, plot, characters) for comprehensive protection.
  • For group creative products, you need to clearly identify the ownership and contribution of each member before submitting the application.

Above is the article “What to do to register copyright for game characters compiled and shared by VCD. Hopefully this information will help you better understand the process, benefits as well as the necessary documents when registering copyright for your game character.

Sincerely,

Is creating karaoke videos a copyright violation?

Nowadays, making karaoke videos and sharing them on social media platforms has become a popular trend. Although it brings many interesting moments of entertainment, copyright is still an issue that many content creators have to consider. So, is creating karaoke videos really a copyright violation? Let’s find out more details with VCD in the article below.

  1. What is a karaoke video?

A karaoke video is a type of video that combines background music (usually a beat or original music with the singer’s voice removed) with lyrics displayed visually so that viewers can sing along. Many people also create additional effects, illustrations or background videos to increase the appeal.

Normally, a karaoke video includes:

  • Background music (beat/instrumental): The music version of the song with the main singer’s voice removed.
  • Lyrics: Synchronized with the beat of the music, often highlighted for the singer to follow easily.
  • Illustrative images or videos: Can be background videos, animations, or graphic effects to make the video more attractive.

However, even if it is just a “remake” or “cover” of a song, karaoke videos still directly use other people’s musical works – which are protected by copyright law.

Is creating karaoke videos a copyright violation?

2. Does creating a karaoke video violate copyright?

Copyright infringement is understood as the act of using another person’s work that has been registered for copyright and is protected by law under the provisions of the Law on Intellectual Property, but is done illegally. These acts may include: Copying, replicating, distributing, showing, displaying, broadcasting, renting… or performing other works protected by law without the consent of the copyright owner.

The copyright owner may be the author himself who created the work, or the producer, publisher, organization, or business to whom the author transfers ownership or exploitation rights. Copyright infringement not only harms the material interests of the owner, but also affects the honor, reputation and control over the work.

Copyright of a musical work includes the right to copy, distribute, perform, communicate and make derivative works…. When you create a karaoke video without the consent of the author or copyright owner, this act can be considered copyright infringement.

Specifically, using the original beat, lyrics, or arrangement of a copyrighted song requires a license or usage agreement with the owner. Otherwise, even if you only share it “for fun” or “non-profit”, the video can still be removed, blocked from display, or copyright claims.

In Article 28 of the Vietnamese Intellectual Property Law, there are up to 16 acts considered copyright infringement. Organizations and individuals who commit one of the above acts may be subject to civil, administrative or criminal sanctions depending on the level and nature of the act.

In addition, according to Clause 4, Article 19 of the Law on Intellectual Property, the owner has the right to protect the work he/she creates, including the right to: “Protect the integrity of the work from being distorted by others; not allowing others to modify or cut the work in any form that harms the honor and reputation of the author.”

Thus, karaoke videos are only legal when there is consent or a license to use from the copyright holder of the musical work. Complying with the above regulations not only helps avoid legal trouble, but also shows respect for the author’s creative efforts, and helps you build a reputable image when producing and sharing karaoke videos on social networking platforms.

Without approval, depending on the nature and severity of the violation, copyright violators when creating karaoke videos may be subject to:

  • Administrative fine: from 3 to 5 million VND (according to Decree 28/2017/ND-CP).
  • Forced to remove the video and make a public correction on mass media.
  • In serious cases, civil lawsuits or criminal prosecution may be initiated if causing great damage to the copyright owner.

To avoid the risk of copyright infringement when creating karaoke videos to post on social networking platforms, you can:

  • Ask for permission or sign a copyright contract with the author, musician or publishing company before using the work.
  • Use copyright-free beats or clearly licensed music.
  • Self-compose songs and create karaoke videos from your own work, thereby fully ensuring intellectual property rights.
  • Clearly state the source, author’s name and non-commercial purpose when sharing publicly, to increase transparency and respect copyright.

Above is the article “Is creating karaoke videos a copyright violation?” compiled and shared by VCD. Hopefully this content will help you better understand copyright and how to use music legally.

Sincerely,

Is it a copyright violation to remove watermarks for use?

Nowadays, when social networks and online platforms are booming, downloading and using images on the Internet has become too familiar. However, many people are still unclear about image ownership and copyright, especially in the case of arbitrarily removing watermarks for use in posts, advertisements or designs. Is this action considered a violation of the law? Let’s find out more in the following article with VCD.

1. What is a watermark and what does it mean?

Watermark, also known as copyright mark, is a form of symbol, logo, author’s name or text inserted directly onto images, videos, or digital documents to show the intellectual property rights of the creator. This can be a blurred symbol in the corner of the photo, or a prominent text displayed on the photo, depending on how the author wants to protect his work.

Adding a watermark is not only for “decoration” but also an effective way to protect copyright, especially in the context of images being shared widely on social networks and online platforms.

The main purpose of watermark is:

  • Affirming copyright: Watermark helps prove who created or owns the image, avoiding cases where others claim or copy it illegally.
  • Preventing unauthorized copying, editing, and use: When an image is watermarked, it becomes more difficult to delete or edit, thereby limiting content theft.
  • Helping viewers identify the origin of the work: Thanks to watermark, Internet users can easily know where the photo comes from, who created it, and from there can find the official source if they want to use it legally.

Watermark is a “shield” to protect content creators, helping them maintain intellectual property rights to their works in the online environment. This is also a reminder for image users to respect creative efforts and comply with copyright regulations.

Is it a copyright violation to remove watermarks for use?

2. Does removing watermarks violate copyright?

According to the Vietnamese Intellectual Property Law, any act of arbitrarily deleting, blurring or editing copyright management information, including watermarks, signatures, logos or any other identifying marks is considered a violation of copyright, unless there is written permission from the author or legal owner.

This action can lead to the following legal consequences:

  • Administrative fines of 15 – 35 million VND (according to Decree 17/2023/ND-CP).
  • Forced removal or destruction of all infringing copies.
  • If using photos with watermarks removed for commercial purposes such as advertising, design, printing or sales, the violator can also be sued in civil proceedings and must compensate the copyright owner for damages.

Thus, “removing the watermark for beauty” seems harmless but in fact is a serious copyright infringement, which can cause you to face many unnecessary legal risks.

3. When is it allowed to use watermarked photos?

Although watermarks are considered a sign of ownership, not in all cases are you prohibited from using watermarked images. There are still legal exceptions that allow use, provided that you comply with the regulations and rights of the author. Specifically, you can use watermarked photos in the following cases:

  • When explicitly permitted by the owner: If you want to use a watermarked image, the safest and most legal way is to ask for permission directly from the author or copyright holder. Some owners may allow free use if you clearly state the source, but others require a fee to grant legal use rights. This is how many businesses, agencies and professional content creators often apply to ensure that they do not violate copyright laws.
  • Images licensed under Creative Commons (CC): Many authors are willing to share their works through Creative Commons (CC) licenses. For example, CC0, CC BY, CC BY-SA… Some licenses allow others to edit, distribute or reuse images, even for commercial purposes, as long as they comply with the accompanying conditions (e.g., credit the author, do not misuse…).
  • Images in the public domain: Images that have expired copyright protection or have been actively put into the public domain by the author will no longer be bound by copyright law. In this case, you can freely use them, including editing or removing the watermark if any, without asking for permission. However, to ensure the credibility of the content, you should still carefully check the source of the image to make sure it is really in the Public Domain.
  • Use for non-commercial illustration purposes: In some special cases, you can use watermarked images for non-commercial purposes, such as: Illustrations in academic articles, research reports, citations of images in lectures, educational materials, inclusion in news articles with clear notes about the origin. However, although considered “fair use” in some contexts, asking for permission in advance is always encouraged to avoid unwanted disputes later.

Above is the article “Is removing watermarks for use a violation of copyright?” VCD sent to you. Hopefully, these shares will help you better understand the image copyright regulations and know how to use the content legally and correctly.

Sincerely,

Can a work whose protection period has expired be re-registered?

Over time, each work has a certain “life cycle” of protection according to the provisions of the law on copyright. When this protection period ends, the property rights of the author or owner of the work are no longer protected by law, and the work will belong to the public. However, in reality, there are still many cases that raise the question: can a work whose protection period has expired be re-registered to continue to be protected? The following article by VCD will help you.

1.      Regulations on the term of copyright protection.

According to the current Intellectual Property Law, copyright can be understood as the rights of organizations and individuals to works they create or own, including personal rights and property rights.

Article 27 of the Law on Intellectual Property stipulates the term of copyright protection in detail as follows:

  • First of all, the term of protection for personal rights will be indefinite except for the right to publish the work or allow others to publish the work.
  • Then the term of protection for this right to publish will be similar to that of property rights, with each type of protection term being different as follows:
  • Cinematographic works, photographic works, applied fine arts works, anonymous works have a term of protection of 75 years from the date of first publication;
  • Cinematographic works, photographic works, applied fine arts works that have not been published within 25 years from the date of creation of the work, the term of protection is 100 years from the date of creation of the work;
  • In the case of anonymous works, when information about the author appears or the work does not belong to the above-mentioned type, the protection period is calculated as the entire life of the author and 50 years following the year of the author’s death; in the case of works with co-authors, the protection period ends in the fiftieth year after the year of the death of the last co-author.

Note: This protection period ends at 24:00 on December 31 of the year in which the copyright protection period ends.

Property rights are exclusively exercised by the author, copyright owner or allowed to be exercised by others in accordance with the provisions of the Law on Intellectual Property. Organizations and individuals when exploiting, using one, some or all of the above rights must ask for permission and pay royalties, remuneration, and other material benefits to the copyright owner.

2.      Can a work whose protection period has expired be re-registered?

According to the above analysis, the copyright protection period is divided into two groups: personal rights and property rights. In which, some personal rights such as the right to name, the right to stand in the name, the right to protect the integrity of the work, etc. are protected indefinitely. On the contrary, property rights, i.e. the right to exploit, copy, distribute, and communicate the work, are only protected for a certain period of time depending on the type of work (usually the author’s lifetime and 50 years after the author’s death).

When the property rights protection period expires, the work will belong to the public. This means that any individual or organization can exploit and use that work without asking for permission or paying compensation to the author or previous owner, as long as the personal rights are respected (no distortion, cutting, or falsification of the content or origin of the work).

Therefore, a work whose protection period has expired cannot be re-registered for copyright. Because registration is only to record the rights that are still in effect, while for works belonging to the public, the property rights of the author or owner have ended. Re-registration, if any, will have no legal value and will not be accepted by the competent state agency.

However, if an individual or organization creates, edits, or develops a work that is already in the public domain (for example, translation, adaptation, adaptation, re-illustration, etc.), the new derivative work can be registered for copyright separately. In this case, the protection only applies to the new creation and does not include the original content that is already in the public domain.

In conclusion, copyright registration is an administrative procedure to record existing rights, not the basis for creating rights. Therefore, re-registration of works whose protection period has expired has no legal basis. At the same time, the Copyright Office can only issue a Certificate when the author or owner’s rights are still valid. Once the work is in the public domain, all property rights have ended, so re-registration will not be accepted.

Above is the article “Can a work that has expired its protection period be re-registered?” that VCD sent to you. We hope this article is useful to you.

Sincerely,