Author: Editor VCD

Are the works protected without copyright registration?

Written by Editor VCD on 30 October, 2023. Posted in Copyright Registration.

For the author or owner of the work, copyright registration will be a recognition of their efforts and creativity, and a talisman to prove if a dispute occurs. However, in reality, there are still many conflicting opinions surrounding copyright registration. And, without copyright registration, will the works be protected? Please follow our article below.

1. What is copyright registration?

“Copyright is the right of organizations and individuals to works they create or own” based on Clause 2, Article 4 of the Intellectual Property Law. Copyright is recognized for literary works, art, books, lectures, musical works, theatrical works, cinematographic works, computer software… When a work is created, the author, or owner of the work, will have moral and property rights to that work.

Copyright registration is an act in which the author or owner carries out registration procedures with a competent authority according to the provisions of law to establish and declare legal ownership of the work through a Certificate. This is a legal recognition of creativity; The author’s efforts with their brainchild. Currently, copyright registration is not mandatory, but only subjects that meet the following conditions have the right to register copyright:

Organizations and individuals whose works are protected by copyright include the person directly creating the product and the owner of the work being protected by copyright in Vietnam as above.

According to the provisions of the Intellectual Property Law, the author or owner of a work can be a domestic individual or legal entity or a foreign individual or legal entity and has the right to apply for copyright registration for the author. your work at the Copyright Office.

When submitting an individual registration application, a domestic legal entity can directly or authorize a copyright representative organization to submit the registration application to the registration agency on its behalf. Individuals and foreign legal entities who want to register a copyright in Vietnam will authorize a copyright representative organization to apply to register the work in Vietnam.

2. Basis for rising copyright

According to Clause 1, Article 6 of the Intellectual Property Law, it is stipulated: “Copyright rights arise from the moment a work is created and expressed in a certain physical form, regardless of content, quality, shape or form. form, medium, language, published or unpublished, registered or unregistered”. Accordingly, copyright is protected when two conditions are met:

Fixation: expressed in a certain physical form;

Originality: understood as the author himself creating the work, and this work must be the result of the first original creation.

Therefore, immediately after completing the work and even though copyright registration procedures have not yet been carried out, copyright will still arise from that moment. When a dispute occurs, in addition to the Copyright Certificate, the State Agency will base it on the time the work was created and shaped in a certain physical form.

3. Effects of copyright registration

Although copyright registration is not mandatory. However, if the author or owner of the work registers copyright with the Copyright Office, it will bring many advantages. After completing copyright registration procedures, the author or owner of the work is granted a Copyright Certificate. This is a certification of the author’s creativity and worthy rewards, encouraging the working spirit of the creator. In particular, registration will be the basis to confirm the time when copyright arises and the rights of the owner of the work.

The copyright registration certificate is intended to ensure the creator of a work against acts of illegal use of the work such as theft, copying, or misuse of that work.

In case of a dispute, the Copyright Registration Certificate is the best evidence proving the author’s ownership of the work. Because, in reality, proving ownership of a work that has not been registered for protection is very difficult.

If the author discovers that someone is illegally using his or her work, the author can request that the user stop using it and claim compensation for damages. This can only be done when the author has registered his copyright.

A copyright certificate is a type of document proving ownership of a work, used when valuing a company’s assets in cases of equitization, business acquisition, or merger.

Above is the article “Are the works protected without copyright registration?”. Hope this article will help you.

Copyright registration and practical difficulties

Written by Editor VCD on 27 October, 2023. Posted in Copyright Registration.

Registering copyright for works has become an inevitable procedure when the issue of copyright infringement and use without the author’s consent becomes more and more common. However, in reality, copyright registration is a complicated procedure that requires a lot of experience, leading to the fact that many authors or other registered entities often encounter certain difficulties. Therefore, this article will focus on exploring some practical difficulties when registering a copyright.

1. Copyright registration procedures

Copyright automatically arises from the moment the work is created in a certain material form, regardless of content, quality, form, medium, language, published or unpublished, registered or not registered. Accordingly, copyright is protected when it satisfies two conditions: (1) is fixed, expressed in a certain material form; (2) to be original, the work must be composed for the first time and by that author.

Currently, copyright registration will be based on the 2005 Intellectual Property Law (amended and supplemented in 2009, 2019, and 2022); Decree 17/2023/ND–CP detailing several articles and measures to implement the Intellectual Property Law on copyright and related rights; Circular 08/2023 regulates forms for registration of copyright and related rights.

Determine the type of work to be registered

Before preparing the copyright registration dossier, the owner and author must determine the type of work intended to be registered according to Article 14 of the Intellectual Property Law.

Prepare and draft copyright registration documents

After determining the type of work intended for copyright registration, the owner and author of the work will proceed to draft the copyright registration dossier according to the law.

Basically, when registering a copyright, the author needs to prepare the following documents and records (in Vietnamese):

Copyright registration declaration (according to the corresponding form in Circular 08/2023/TT-BVHTTDL dated June 2, 2023, Circular stipulating forms for copyright and related rights registration activities).

Two copies of the copyrighted work. For works with unique characteristics such as paintings, statues, monuments, reliefs, and monumental paintings associated with architectural works; works that are too large and bulky, copies of registered works are replaced by three-dimensional photographs.

In case the author or owner authorizes another organization, there must be an additional power of attorney. If authorizing another individual, the authorization document must be authenticated according to the provisions of law.

Documents proving the right to apply;

Written consent of co-authors, if the work has co-authors;

Written consent of the co-owners, if the copyright is jointly owned;

Notarized identity card of the author or owner of the work;

Notarized copy of the company’s Business Registration Certificate (if the owner is a company).

Apply for copyright registration

There are three ways to submit copyright registration documents: (1) submit directly to the Copyright Office; (2) submit by mail; (3) submit online via the Online Public Service Portal.

2. Some practical difficulties when registering copyright

Although copyright registration has become popular, in reality, this registration still faces many difficulties:

Firstly, the registration application processing time is slower than the regulations. According to the law, the time for the Copyright Office to process and check the validity of the dossier is 01 month from the date of receiving the dossier. In case the dossier is valid according to regulations, within 15 working days, the competent state agency is responsible for issuing a Copyright Registration Certificate.

However, the general situation of copyright registration applications for simple works such as works of applied art, written works, and photographic works… is that the actual implementation time often takes time. lasting more than a month, or even more than two months. This may also partly stem from the increasing number of copyright registration applications over the years, leading to overload.

Secondly, the name and content of the work registered for protection as works of applied art should be noted to remove the word “banner” or “slogan” from the name of the work. In the past 2-3 years, the Copyright Office has often not approved registered works containing the above phrases for the reason that copyright protection does not protect “slogan”.

Thirdly, the system for looking up copyrighted records is still in its infancy. Currently, works that have been granted copyright certificates can only be searched on one channel: the yearbook search section on the copyright department’s website. Compared to other industrial property lookup channels, this lookup is still too rudimentary and the amount of updated information is not enough to meet the lookup needs of customers.

Besides, there are still some remaining difficulties such as:

The process of preparing documents, documents, and related papers is very difficult to learn and prepare yourself. Registration documents may be invalid, missing, or even incorrect, causing time-consuming processing later;

In cases where travel is not convenient, pay the registration fee via bank transfer and then apply by post to the competent authority. This is the process that causes the most problems that the subject needs to solve because it will not receive direct support from the authorities;

After applying, you need to monitor the status of the registration application to promptly respond in writing to the competent state agency when any problems arise.

Difficulty completing and supplementing documents following the law.

Registering copyright and related rights has many benefits, in addition, instructions on procedures and dossiers for registering copyright and related rights are also posted in great detail by the Copyright Office on the department’s website. Copyright has created many advantages for people in the process of establishing copyright. The regulations for registering copyright on black and white paper are simple, but when registering a copyright, you will see the inadequacies and difficulties. Therefore, to avoid wasting a lot of time, authors or owners of works should seek out experienced service and consulting organizations for timely support and processing.

Above is the article: “Copyright registration and practical difficulties“. Hope this article will help you.

Is it illegal to take someone else’s book to make an e-book and share it online?

Written by Editor VCD on 26 October, 2023. Posted in Copyright Registration, Written works.

Instead of traditional paper books, in the age of the information explosion, the use of electronic books (eBooks) makes it more convenient for people to read, carry, and store books. However, e-books also face an extremely high risk of copyright infringement. In many cases, paper books have been copied, made into e-books, and illegally distributed online, causing damage to authors and publishers. It can be affirmed that the act of using another person’s book to make an electronic book (eBook) and sharing it on the internet is an act of copyright infringement.

1. What is an e-book?

Electronic books are books published in digital form, existing in the form of an electronic file (digital file), used through personal electronic devices such as computers, smartphones, Tablet computers, and e-readers. E-books are released on the internet environment, readers will buy books at online stores and can download books and read them right on their devices, even when connected to the network and when they are offline with no network connection.

E-books are often formatted in formats such as EPUB, PDF, MOBI, AZW, TXT… which are formats that prevent others from editing the book content. Although the content cannot be edited, e-books are designed so that readers can choose the reading format (horizontal-vertical format, font style, font size, etc.) and are compatible with all screens of different sizes.

Currently, e-books are popular for reasons such as saving storage space, saving costs because the price is often cheaper than paper books, can be purchased quickly without going directly to the store, and are easy to carry when traveling.

2. The act of using another person’s book to make an electronic book (eBook) and sharing it on the internet is an act of copyright infringement

Publishers, in addition to having to deal with pirated books, also have to deal with eBooks being “pirated” and widely distributed online. There have been many individuals who have used original books published by others to make eBooks and share them on the internet, including sharing them for free or reselling them at low prices, violating the legitimate rights and interests of the owners. own copyright to those books.

According to Article 20 of the Intellectual Property Law, the right to copy works, and the right to distribute and communicate works to the public are some of the rights that are included in the property rights of the copyright owner. The copyright owner can exclusively exercise or allow other organizations and individuals to exercise the above rights. At the same time, organizations and individuals exploit and use one, some, or all of the rights. The above-mentioned must be authorized by the copyright owner and pay royalties and other material benefits (if any) to the copyright owner.

In addition, according to Article 28 of the Intellectual Property Law, acts of infringement of the author’s property rights, including the rights to copy, distribute, communicate works, etc. are determined to be acts of infringement of copyright. Using another person’s published original book to make an ebook and share it on the internet violates the right to copy, distribute, and communicate the work belonging to the copyright owner.

The above acts may be subject to administrative sanctions according to the provisions of Decree 131/2013/ND-CP as follows:

Acts of infringing on the right to distribute works (Article 15): Fine from 10,000,000 VND to 30,000,000 VND and apply remedial measures to force the removal of copies of infringing works in electronic form, in the network and digital environment or force the destruction of infringing evidence.

Acts of infringing on the right to communicate works to the public (Article 17): Fine from 15,000,000 VND to 30,000,000 VND and apply remedial measures to force the removal of copies of infringing works.

Acts of infringing the right to copy works (Article 18): Fine from 15,000,000 VND to 35,000,000 VND and apply remedial measures to force the removal of copies of infringing works in electronic form, in the network and digital environment or force the destruction of infringing evidence.

For the above reasons, if individuals or organizations want to use a book to make an e-book, they must ask permission and pay royalties to the author or copyright owner of that book. If they do not do so, that person may be subject to administrative penalties according to the fine level mentioned above.

Above is the article “Is it illegal to take someone else’s book to make an e-book and share it online?”. We hope this article is useful to you.

Mechanism of copyright protection for press works

Written by Editor VCD on 25 October, 2023. Posted in Copyright Registration, Press work.

1. Copyright for press works

A press work is the smallest constitutive unit of a journalistic product, with independent content and complete structure, including news and articles expressed in writing, sound, or images.

According to Article 6, Clause 3, Decree 17/2023/ND-CP, press works specified in Point C, Clause 1, Article 14 of the Intellectual Property Law are works with independent content and complete structure, including genres: reportage, notes, reports, interviews, reflections, investigations, comments, editorials, treatises, press memoirs, and other journalistic genres for publication and broadcast in print and newspapers verbal, visual, electronic or other means

According to Articles 19 and 20 of the Intellectual Property Law, copyright for press works includes personal rights and property rights, specifically:

Moral rights: Name the journalistic work; use real names or pseudonyms when journalistic works are published or used; Publish, disseminate, or let others publish or disseminate; Protect the integrity of journalistic works, do not allow others to edit, mutilate, or distort in any form that is harmful to your honor and reputation;

Property rights: Entitlement to royalties – money collected by organizations and individuals who exploit and use journalistic works; Receive remuneration when journalistic works are used; Enjoy material benefits from allowing others to use the work in forms such as publishing, republishing, and displaying.

2. Copyright protection mechanism for press works

Currently, the protection of copyright for journalistic works is facing many challenges when copyright infringement is still very common and diverse. Therefore, violations are becoming increasingly sophisticated with the exploitation of copyright infringement with the development of technology. Authors and owners of works need to recognize which acts violate copyright, and at the same time need to protect their works consciously. Copyright protection is implemented through the following mechanisms:

2.1. Civil measures

Civil measures are measures that allow authors to protect their works against copyright infringements that directly affect legitimate rights and interests, as well as infringements on the honor and reputation of the author’s creative knowledge, specifically:

Require the violator to remove the offending post, and commit in writing not to repeat the violation, and if the offender repeats it, stronger measures will be taken; negotiate and negotiate between the two parties to bring the most beneficial results to the author and copyright owner.

To conduct civil proceedings based on the request of the intellectual property rights holder or the organization or individual suffering damage caused by the infringement. Accordingly, the author of the infringed press work can file a lawsuit with the People’s Court of the place of residence of the individual, and the headquarters of the legal entity committing the act of infringement or the Court where the act of infringement was committed. When filing a lawsuit, the author of the infringed journalistic work needs to prepare accompanying evidence;

In case there is a claim for non-contractual damages, according to Article 584 of the 2015 Civil Code, the author is obliged to prove: (i) the act of infringement; (ii) actual damage occurred; (iii) the relationship between the infringement and the damage caused.

2.2. Criminal measures

Criminal measures are measures to handle acts of intellectual property rights infringement that are defined as crimes under criminal proceedings, specifically:

The author of a journalistic work can file a criminal complaint when discovering that another individual has committed an infringing act that meets all the elements constituting a crime as prescribed in Article 225 of the Penal Code of 2015, amended and supplemented in 2017;

The criminal complaint will be sent to the competent authority, specifically, the district investigation agency where the crime occurred or where the offender resides.

2.3. Administrative measures

Intellectual property rights holders, individuals and other organizations that suffer damage due to acts of infringement or detect acts of infringement have the right to request competent state agencies to handle administrative violations of infringement, specifically the Inspectorate, Market Management, Customs, Police, and People’s Committees at all levels will have the authority to handle acts of infringement of press works. Administrative violations due to infringement of copyright of press works and current remedial measures are prescribed in Decree No. 131/2013/ND-CP of the Government stipulating penalties for administrative violations on copyright and related rights, specifically from Article 8 to Article 12, Article 15 to Article 20, and Article 27 to Article 35.

Depending on each case, as well as the level of goodwill of the infringing party and the author’s wishes, the author of the infringed journalistic work can choose for himself/herself appropriate measures.

Above is the article “Mechanism of copyright protection for press works“. We hope this article is useful to you.

Copyright protection for data collection

Written by Editor VCD on 23 October, 2023. Posted in Computer program and data compilation, Copyright Registration.

Data collection is one of the subjects protected by copyright according to the provisions of international conventions and Vietnamese law. For example, one person collected folk songs, idioms, and proverbs from all over the country and arranged them by topic, gathering them into a book called “Vietnamese folk songs, idioms, and proverbs”, then that book is protected under the category of data collection. We would like to introduce this article to our readers to learn more about how data collection is protected by copyright in Vietnam.

1. Regulations on data collection protection according to several international conventions on intellectual property

Important international conventions on copyright, including the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (revised 1971), the Agreement on Commercial Aspects of Property Rights (TRIPS) of 1994, and the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT) of 1996 both recognize copyright protection for data collections.

In Clause 5, Article 2 of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, Data Collections are stipulated as follows: “Collections, literary works or works of art, such as Encyclopedias and anthologies, the selection or arrangement of which is the result of intellectual activity, must be protected as such, without prejudice to the copyright of the works constituting them in this collection”.

In addition, Article 10, Paragraph 2 of the 1994 TRIPS Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights stipulates: “Collections of data or other material, whether in machine-readable form or in other forms, where the selection or arrangement of content is the result of intellectual activity must be protected as it is. The above protection, to the extent that it does not cover the data or materials themselves, must not affect the existing copyright in the data or materials themselves.

In addition, the WIPO Copyright Treaty (1996) also mentions the protection of data collection in Article 5, specifically: “Data or other materials collected in any form, which constitute intellectual creations, are protected. This protection does not extend to the data or materials themselves and is without prejudice to any copyright in the data or materials in the collection.

Vietnam is a member of the above conventions and has codified the above provisions in the Vietnam Intellectual Property Law.

2. Regulations on data collection protection according to Vietnamese law

Data collection is one of the types of works protected by copyright, recorded at Point m, Clause 1, Article 14 of the Intellectual Property Law.

According to Article 22, Clause 2 of the Intellectual Property Law, data collection is “a creative collection expressed in the selection and arrangement of documents in electronic or other forms.” For example, a person can collect and publish his own short stories, titled “A collection of short stories by author A”; or one can collect photos of cloud landscapes in the Northwest region by many different authors and create a photo collection called “Northwest Clouds”. Currently, electronic databases are also protected by copyright in the form of data collections. The author of a data collection may or may not be the author of the documents in that data collection, but is only the person who collects and arranges the available documents in a certain order.

The author of the data collection will have full moral and property rights over that data collection, specifically:

Name the data collection work;

Put your real name or pseudonym on the data collection work; be given your real name or pseudonym when the work is published or used;

Publish the work or allow others to publish the data collection work;

Protect the integrity of the data collection work, and do not allow others to edit, mutilate, or distort the work in any form that is harmful to the author’s honor and reputation.

Making derivative works;

Directly or indirectly copy all or part of the work by any means or form;

Distributing to the public originals and copies of works;

Broadcast and communicate works to the public;

In addition, Article 22, Clause 2 of the Intellectual Property Law also stipulates that copyright protection for data collections does not cover the materials themselves, and does not prejudice the copyright of the materials themselves. Therefore, it can be understood that copyright for data collection and copyright for materials belonging to data collection are independent of each other, the implementation and formation of data collection work is independent. The data must not prejudice the materials’ copyright in the data collection.

Above is the article “Copyright protection for data collection“. We hope this article is useful to you.

Distinguish between “copyright infringement” and “plagiarism”

Written by Editor VCD on 20 October, 2023. Posted in Copyright Registration.

Plagiarism is generally an unacceptable behavior in society, it is the act of taking the efforts and achievements of others into one’s work. Copyright infringement is the act of copying and using a work without permission or without paying copyright to the author according to the law. So, is plagiarism an infringement of copyright or not, and how to Distinguish between “copyright infringement” and “plagiarism”

“Plagiarism” is not a concept in the law, in other words, current Vietnamese law does not have specific, clear regulations to define or explain the issue of plagiarism. Plagiarism is an issue considered from an ethical perspective, while copyright infringement is a legal issue, clearly stipulated in the law.

Plagiarism is the act of copying work or using ideas and methods in another person’s work and incorporating them into your work, presenting them as your original work. In an academic environment, plagiarism is a serious violation of academic ethics. Plagiarism can be caused by intentional or unintentional errors. Some common acts of plagiarism include:

Improper citation of source documents;

Taking another’s work and claiming it as your own, including taking from translating foreign works;

Paraphrase someone else’s work by changing some words, changing the order of sentences, or closely following their argument structure to create your work;

Self-plagiarism (for example, submitting your work to multiple editors simultaneously, or using without explicit citation your own previously published work).

Acts of copyright infringement are acts clearly defined in Article 28 of the Intellectual Property Law. Common acts of infringement include: copying works; making derivative works; performing works; broadcasting, distributing, communicating to the public works; and… without asking permission, without paying royalties to the author and copyright owner. People who commit acts of copyright infringement must be held responsible before the law, specifically administrative or criminal sanctions, depending on the severity of the violation.

There are similarities between plagiarism and copyright infringement, such as arbitrarily copying, using works, or impersonating the author. However, not all acts of plagiarism are considered plagiarism. copyright infringement and not all acts of copyright infringement are considered plagiarism. Specifically, the article gives examples of the following cases:

There is plagiarism but does not violate copyright: a person can take the results of another person’s research work and put it into his or her research work but without citing or naming the cited work or author. author of that work.
Infringement of copyright but not plagiarism: the act of using materials available on the internet including photos, videos, paintings, audio recordings, video recordings, and articles but not within the exceptions allowed Usage permission prescribed by law may still be considered an infringement of copyright. For example, reposting other people’s articles and short stories on your blog or website without the permission of the author or copyright owner.

Above is the article “Distinguish between “copyright infringement” and “plagiarism””. We hope this article is useful to you.

Are photography works with the same subject matter considered an infringement of copyright?

Written by Editor VCD on 19 October, 2023. Posted in Copyright Registration, Photographic work.

It is common in reality for photographers to take pictures of the same scene. Therefore, Are photography works with the same subject matter considered an infringement of copyright?

According to current provisions of Vietnamese law, photographic works are one of the types of protected works (in Clause 1, Article 14 of the Intellectual Property Law). Photographic works are protected under the following conditions:

Created directly by the author using his or her intellectual labor without copying from the works of others (in Clause 3, Article 14 of the Intellectual Property Law).

Authors and copyright owners are Vietnamese organizations and individuals; Foreign organizations and individuals whose works are published for the first time in Vietnam but have not been published in any other country or are published simultaneously in Vietnam within thirty days from the date of the work that is published for the first time in another country; Foreign organizations and individuals whose works are protected in Vietnam under international copyright treaties to which the Socialist Republic of Vietnam is a member.

In addition, according to Clause 1, Article 6 of the Intellectual Property Law: “Copyright arises from the moment the work is created and expressed in a certain material form, regardless of content or quality, form, medium, language, published or unpublished, registered or unregistered.” From the above regulations, it can be seen that copyright only protects the form of expression of the work, not the content of the work (or the ideas conveyed in the work). Therefore, if different authors take photos of the same object but have a separate form of expression of the work, independent of other authors, those photographic works are completely protected by copyright.

Specifically, taking photos of the same object but different authors express their creativity through camera angles, methods, photography techniques, and the overall idea of the work, creating different for the viewer different feelings. Although the two works capture the same subject, there is no significant similarity in expression, and if the viewer can easily distinguish the two works, both works are protected by copyright.

For the above reasons, it can be affirmed that photographic works using the same subject by different authors are not considered copyright infringement.

Above is the article “Are photography works with the same subject matter considered an infringement of copyright?“. We hope this article is useful to you.

Does the model of a painting/photograph have rights to the painting or photo that includes them?

Written by Editor VCD on 18 October, 2023. Posted in Copyright Registration, Photographic work.

According to the provisions of the Intellectual Property Law of many countries around the world, the photographer will be the copyright holder of the photographic works he or she took, and the artist will be the copyright holder of the photographs or pictures drawn by them. However, for photos or paintings of people, does the model appearing in the photo/painting have any rights to that painting or photo? Please follow VCD’s article below for more detailed information.

1. What are image rights?

An individual’s image right is an individual’s moral right. Therefore, when using anyone’s image, you must have that person’s permission and consent. This right is specifically stipulated in Clause 1, Article 32 of the 2015 Civil Code as follows:

Individuals have the right to their image. The use of an individual’s image must be approved by that person.

Using another person’s image for commercial purposes requires compensation to the person with the image unless otherwise agreed by the parties.

Therefore, if arbitrarily using a personal image, the person with the image has the right to request the Court to issue a decision forcing the violator and other relevant agencies, organizations, and individuals to recover, destroy, terminate the use of images, compensate for damages and apply other remedies according to the provisions of law.

The photo or painting model also has image rights to the painting/photograph in which they are present. However, if the author of the photo/painting has given consent to use the model’s image, the model does not have ownership rights to this photo/painting.

2. The model’s rights to the painting/photograph containing their face

A photo or painting can create a copyright conflict between the person being photographed and the photographer or artist. Both sides have reliable and solid arguments about why they have the right to the photo or painting, one side is the creator, and the other side is the main object of that painting.

The answer to who the copyright belongs to will depend on whether the individual’s image has been approved by that person or not, and whether the modeler has been compensated or not.

An artist spends hours drawing a professional poser hired to pose, standing still for hours on end. In this case, the rights to the resulting painting will belong to the artist, not the subject of the painting.

Likewise, the rights to the photo will belong to the photographer and not the person being photographed. However, whether the photographer has the right to take photos of the person being photographed is another matter. If a picture is drawn or taken without the permission of the subject being photographed, it can lead to lawsuits from the person being photographed or drawn because their privacy has been violated or their honor has been violated (if any)…

Accordingly, the rights to the photographs/paintings belong to the photographer/artist in the absence of any other conflict of nature. If the subject being photographed uses the photo without permission, they have violated the photographer’s copyright.

Above is the article “Does the model of a painting/photograph have rights to the painting or photo that includes them?“. We hope this article is useful to you.

Is a live stream using other people’s music or images considered copyright infringement?

Written by Editor VCD on 17 October, 2023. Posted in Copyright Registration, Musical work, Photographic work.

1. Is a live stream using other people’s music or images considered copyright infringement?

Livestream (also known as live streaming) is the process of broadcasting live video in real-time to an audience on the internet without needing to record or store it in advance. By using smartphones connected to the internet, through technology platforms such as Facebook, and YouTube… users can live stream and share with the public what is happening at present. Although livestream technology brings many benefits to everyone, it has a high potential risk of copyright infringement. There are many cases where live streamers do not pay attention and accidentally use other people’s music, images, and videos while performing livestreams. There are also other cases where live streamers intentionally use other people’s music, images, and videos to attract viewers even without the permission of the owners of those sounds, images, and videos. The above actions, whether intentional or unintentional, are considered copyright infringement.

According to the provisions of Vietnamese law on copyright, one of the property rights under copyright is the right to broadcast and communicate to the public the work by wired or wireless means, electronic information networks, or any other technical means, including providing the work to the public in a manner accessible to the public at a place and time of their choosing (Article 20 of the Intellectual Property Law). The exploitation and use of broadcasting rights and the right to communicate works to the public by individuals and organizations must be with the permission of the copyright owner and pay royalties and other material benefits (if applicable). yes) to the copyright owner. The act of livestreaming and using another person’s work without permission and without paying royalties to the author or copyright owner is an act contrary to the law and infringes upon broadcasting rights to communicate the work to the public. In addition, Article 28 of the Intellectual Property Law clearly states that acts infringing on the property rights of the author or copyright owner are considered acts of copyright infringement.

From the above regulations, it can be confirmed that the act of livestreaming involves using other people’s music and images without the permission of the author or copyright owner, and without paying royalties to the copyright owner. The author is considered an act of copyright infringement.

2. How will livestream infringement of copyright be handled?

According to the provisions of Decree 131/2013/ND-CP, livestream infringement of copyright can be subject to administrative sanctions as follows:

Acts of infringing on the right to publish works (Article 11): Fine from 5,000,000 VND to 10,000,000 VND for acts of publishing works without permission of the copyright owner according to regulations; Forcing public corrections on mass media.

Acts of infringing on the right to communicate works to the public (Article 17): Fine from 15,000,000 VND to 30,000,000 VND for acts of communicating works to the public by wire, wireless, or network means of electronic information or any technical means without the permission of the copyright owner as prescribed; Forced removal of copies of infringing works.

Acts of infringing on the performer’s right to fix a live performance (Article 23): Fine from 3,000,000 VND to 5,000,000 VND for the act of fixing a live performance on audio or recording images without the permission of the performer’s rights holder; Forced removal of copies of infringing performances in electronic form, on the network and digital environment or forced destruction of infringing exhibits.

Acts of infringing on the right to broadcast or otherwise transmit to the public an unformed performance (Article 25): Fine from 20,000,000 VND to 40,000,000 VND for acts of broadcasting or transmitting in other ways to the public an unfixed performance without the permission of the performer’s rights holder, unless the performance is intended for broadcast; Forced removal of copies of infringing performances in electronic form, on the network and digital environment or destruction of infringing exhibits.

Acts of infringing on the right to distribute to the public broadcast programs (Article 31): Fine from 10,000,000 VND to 30,000,000 VND for distributing to the public copies of broadcast programs without the permission of the rights owner of the broadcasting organization; Forced removal of copies of broadcast programs in electronic form, on the network and digital environment, or forced destruction of infringing material evidence.

Trên đây là bài viết ” Liệu phát trực tiếp sử dụng nhạc hoặc hình ảnh của người khác có bị coi là vi phạm bản quyền không? “. Chúng tôi hy vọng bài viết này hữu ích với bạn.

Disguised as a movie review video is there a copyright infringement

Written by Editor VCD on 16 October, 2023. Posted in Copyright Registration, Dramatic work.

Movie review originally meant rating and commenting on movies, this is a popular and simple way to provide information about movies, to introduce people who are interested in a certain movie. However, movie reviews are gradually being transformed into short videos cut and edited to fully introduce the movie content and then posted on YouTube, Facebook Watch, or TikTok, to make money. Therefore, is making those movie review videos a copyright violation? Let’s follow VCD’s “Disguised as a movie review video is there a copyright infringement” next article.

1. Movie review and variations of the word “review”

Reviewing is currently a blooming trend among young people. The review profession is a profession that uses subjective opinions from a user’s perspective to evaluate a product, service, restaurant, tourist attractions, and even good movies. Express your honest feelings and assessments after each experience, thereby helping people decide whether to use the product or service or watch that movie again or not. In short, movie reviews are understood as the subjective feelings and assessments of the reviewer during the process of watching the movie.

According to the law, video review makers are not allowed to reveal the main details of the movie, but usually, they will give an overview of the characters, actors, or movie set. From there, the reviewers will express their personal opinions to help the audience have more reference information in the process of choosing the movie they will watch.

However, currently, the nature of movie reviews in Vietnam is a variation of a movie recap (summarizing part or all of the movie’s content). Short videos appear on social networking sites such as YouTube, Facebook, and TikTok with the title being a movie review but a summary of the movie’s content. Because these videos/clips often narrate all the details of the movie and have little or no evaluation from the video maker. These videos even have misleading reviews of the film’s content, affecting the message the production team wants to convey to viewers.

2. Does a movie review violate copyright?

According to the Intellectual Property Law, “A derivative work is a work created based on one or more existing works through translation from one language to another, adaptation, compilation, annotation, selection, arrangement, musical adaptation and other adaptations”. In particular, creating movie review videos is considered a derivative work. Reviewing a movie that reveals all or part of the movie’s content is considered to be infringing on the copyright of the work and the owner’s rights to the work.

According to the newly amended and supplemented regulations in Clause 10, Article 4 of the Intellectual Property Law: “Copying is the creation of a copy of all or part of a work or audio or video recording by any means or What form? With this regulation, copying part of an official work is considered an act of copying, creating a legal basis to overcome problems due to the lack of clear provisions in the law in many cases related to copyright. previous author.

According to Article 28 of the Intellectual Property Law, among the acts of copyright infringement are:

Making derivative works without the permission of the author or copyright owner of the work used to make derivative works, except in the case of converting the work into braille or another language for the disabled. town;

Using the work without the copyright owner’s permission nor, not paying royalties, remuneration, or other material benefits as prescribed by law.

Thus, except for converting works into Braille or another language for the blind, any creation of derivative works must be approved by the author/owner of the original work.

In addition, movie reviewing is not included in the cases of using published works without asking for permission, without having to pay royalties or remuneration, and is also not included in the cases of using published works without requiring permission. allowed but must pay royalties and remuneration according to regulations.

Therefore, anyone who reviews a movie and reveals all or part of the existing movie content is violating the copyright of the work and the rights of the owner of the work. Depending on the level of violation, individuals and organizations making movie reviews may be administratively or criminally sanctioned according to the provisions of the law.

Above is the article “Disguised as a movie review video – Is there a copyright infringement?” We hope this article is useful to you.